SOCIAL: IS RELIGION IMPACTING SOCIETIES ACCES TO CURES TO STD'S

Is religion the reason why we don’t have cures to the most common venereal diseases? Religious organizations have amassed extensive corporate power since the inception of corporations. They control a lot of what we purchase today. Some religions have control of corporations that own pharmaceuticals. What, you may ask is the reason that one may even consider this? This is ludacris! You may say. But let me tell you. If we are to be an informed public, we must consider every possibility, whether it be negative or positive. Those who do otherwise will live in ignorance. Ignorance is death. The reason that is probable or even likely a consideration is that, a lot of these organizations want to keep people monogamous as it is the belief of their doctrine. And the way to do this is to keep people in fear. Fear of ascertaining a disease, which can possibly be cured. I encourage you to think outside the box to solve our societal problems. We all need to do our due diligence to ensure that the people are protected. And to do this we must ponder and think of others. Vindicate those that you believe may be a harm and put it out there. You can be right with the right ear.

SOCIAL: SLUTHOOD A RIGHT OF PASSAGE

Sluthood is a right of passage. It is the time when a girl becomes a women. This phase is all about the animalistic desires of human interaction. It is the time when a female can exhibit her confidence. Sluts are women who have overcome massive resistance. And they express themself through intimacy. Next time anyone that tells you that your a slut,be proud of it. Show them your talent. Don't be afraid to make that milkshake and celebrate your confidence. You have something that other girls don't.

VIP #1: IS THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM DATED

In university, the way that they teach politics is that there is a left and a right. This is what is referred to as the political spectrum in political ideologies class. In their attempt to teach such concept to students, they intrigue them to align with either side. Left means communism followed to the right by socialism and then liberalism in the center which is then preceded with conservatism on the center right and then fascism on the right. It is clear that these ideologies contrast one another. In the universities attempt to teach these concepts, students fall into the trap of aligning themselves with one. But I think there is a new form of political ideology that has not been yet explored. This is because it is difficult to categorize. Hear me out. This belief likes parts from the left such as the welfare state and free medical care and parts of the right which prefers capitalism and the military. Is this the future of politics? Picking and choosing? I believe the only solution for political scientists is to individually vote on each policy that are enacted. Voting on each policy can improve political participation. This could allow politicians to not be stuck following one ideology. Of course, voting on each policy would be tedious and expensive but, perhaps we could find a way to implement this. Maybe having an online platform so people can vote for each policy could be a streamlined way of enacting such process. Imagine, that the liberal tears AKA Justin Trudeau is thinking about making university free for all citizens. What his party would do, seeing as they are the government in power, is go to the computer and create a poll so that people can vote on it. This would increase the adaptability of our political system and allow for increased political participation. Having such online platform can lead to an informed public.

Should Canada have a computerized voting system to vote for each policy?

Yes

No

Make a Poll in Seconds | Free & Unlimited | Poll Maker

INQUISITIVE: CHICK-FIL-A CLOSURE IN THE UK

SCHOLAR: STREET CRIME: MISCHIEF & VANDALISIM

SOCIAL: THE RACIST INTOLLERANCE

Is the lefts intolerance to free speech racist in America?  Well, yes an no.  For something to be racist it requires an individual from a different culture to some how be discriminatory to another person of another culture.  So therefore, that who is of the same culture as another and is causing discrimination is not racist but rather causing a tort nuisance.  But we as Canadians or any other culture for the matter, observing Americans and the way they communicate and our intolerance to some of their peoples abrasive ways can be considered racism.  Wait a minute, hold that thought.  This is because it is part of the American culture under the first amendment of their constitution and they are entitled to this privilege.  We Canadians or other who criticize the American ways of rough communications are actually being racist when we do this.  Our intolerance to their banter is racist.  Our constant judging of their manner is really disapproving them and I quite frankly find it offensive that our people could be so racist.  We publicly say, passive aggressively, “that’s not how we do it in the north,” with little disregard or consideration that our statements could be considered racist even offensive.  This is what is called prejudice.  Leftist countries act like they are so self righteous yet none of them have considered that their simple judgements are actually racist.  I believe in free speech and for those that don’t recognize their own racism, I am truly sorry.

SOCIAL: SIDE OF SCIENCE

The scientific view on humans is that we are all animals. Biology classifies each living thing into categories. The way that science has organized living things is a distinction of our intellect. We are able to think with our minds and logically come up with explanations in which could solve our societal problems. This is also the feature that us humans have rationalized as to the decision of whether life is considered to be valued. We are the only creatures on this planet that have the faculties to be able to think that one person ending another’s life is wrong. We humans, have become so sophisticated as to base our entire society on this principle. Our logic distinguishes us from other species in this world. And life, as a valuable commodity can open many doors. We humans, like animals band together to form groups with similar interest. I feel that our roots as primates give us a lineage of human development. We should therefore cherish our backgrounds and accept that we are first human and second animals. I side with the scientific view that humans are animals, for if the scientific establishment gets derailed we wouldn’t have the progress that we do today. We also do share common traits with animals such as instinct amongst others. Therefore, I urge be weary of your animalistic instincts as these lack the logic of the faculties of our mind and thus can cost a life.